The New ROI: Return on Influence

Feb 1, 2012   //   by admin   //   Blog, Blog  //  2 Comments

How to define, measure and find return on your social media campaigns

Share on TwitterShare via email

By: Jay Osterholm, Founder and CEO of The ODM Group

Perhaps the greatest marketing challenge of 2011 was determining social media ROI. As more and more companies devoted marketing budgets to this now necessary business strategy, executives questioned the value, and most importantly, the return of this investment.

We are now in the second month of 2012, and there is no clear industry-standard or formula to calculate the absolute ROI of social media. There are varying theories, and many social media experts have their own definitions and ways of determining ROI for clients. To some, this may seem catastrophic. I see it as a challenge, and therefore an opportunity.

A few years back, as marketers we had to transform the mindset of our executives, clients, and the public to embrace social media as not only a new communication tool, but the tool of the future. The challenge to calculate social media ROI leads us to yet another moment of transformation. A simple transformation of thought can solve this debate. For me, it is evident that the solution may not lie in the way we define social media in terms of absolute value ROI, but more the way we define ROI in terms of social media.

Earlier this week I was at the GPCC’s Economic Outlook event, where I probably handed out 10 business cards. What was the ROI of that? It technically is a marketing tactic for my company, as well as my personal brand. I received one phone call from those 10 cards. But strictly from a quantitative standpoint, I have a 10% return rate. That sounds rather grim. However, with a small transformation of thinking, I exposed 10 people to my company, my name, and our contact information. I created a personal connection with each of those 10 people. At its core, isn’t that the holy grail of marketing? So quantitatively, I am currently at a 1 out of 10. But qualitatively, I excelled.

Social media benefits are achieved directly through connections with customers, who go on to make recommendations, share product information and make purchasing decisions. A recent e-marketer study found that over 50 % of Twitter followers are more likely to purchase from a brand they follow. Moreover, according to Mashable.com, 60% of brand followers are more likely to recommend a brand to a friend after following the brand on Twitter. In my opinion, these numbers certainly prove some value for social media. Through social channels, we are making connections and influencing purchasing decisions, which once again are two main objectives of marketing.

That being said, I propose a new definition for ROI – Return on Influence rather than Return on Investment. The social connections made on these channels offer influence and exposure which should be the core factors for ROI or influence. As a business owner, I understand the need to monitor return on expenses to maintain your bottom line. However, as a marketer, I see a need for a different mindset for the new paradigm shift of social media ROI.

Analytics should connect to engagement rather than monetary investment. Popular research found that 48% of corporations are creating ROI measurements for internal programs. Of that 48%, 65% of corporations use engagement as a top metric.

Measure the number of interactions your brand has on social media channels – not just followers. While followers are important, interactions are conversations and the instances where direct contact is made with the consumer. This is where the sale conversion is likely to occur.

  • http://twitter.com/theelusivefish Rob Clark

    Jay – while I’ll agree that Social Media ROI can very much be the Kobyashi Maru of communications measurement, I have to disagree with using the Kirk gambit of reprogramming the scenario so it can be won as being the proper path to take.

    ROI is a business term with very specific meaning.  To use it in a context other than commonly understood and accepted by business leaders is going to be confusing at best, but more often misleading.

    I think the proper approach is not the Kirk gambit, but rather the WOPR solution.  The only winning move is not to play. 

    Because nine times out of ten, when our clients are asking for ROI, it is not “ROI” they are after.  They are asking to see demonstrated the value.  They are asking to see how the needle gets moved on business objectives. 

    We have the ability to do that.

    The first move is to step beyond simple exposure metrics and look to the ‘why’ of getting that exposure.  Why were you trying to shove that content in front of people’s eyes?  Why were you trying to get them to engage on your social channels?  When the client demands ROI, explain what it is you think they’re *really* after.  Educate them on the difference between that and ROI. Start your measuring there and you’ll be able to come back to your clients with some hard objectives won and fodder enough to talk about Social Media Success instead of redefinitions of acronyms.

    - Rob Clark
    @theelusivefish:twitter

    • Josterholm

       

      Rob:

      Nice to meet you, even if by blog. 

      I wanted to thank you for your post to our article on ROI.  (By the way, I loved the Star Trek references).  I am glad you took the time to read, reflect and articulate your opinions.  That is one of the things that is so wonderful about collegial online dialog.  I agree on the meaning of ROI, of course; I have a finance / marketing background so I am keenly aware of the definition.  We are not implying that any meaningful outcome would consistently or reliably result from a rigged-strategy.  Clearly that was the collective view-point of the ‘no-win scenario’ which the writers of that franchise meant to convey; that success from a one-off rigged strategy was a meaningless victory. As I recall, the victory was for innovative-thinking not winning the simulation.

      Along the lines of innovative thought, the point I was trying to make was that Influence and Investment have correlating data-points.  We always look to connect the dots, the data, the ideas.  From a purely marketing stand-point, If you can move sentiment you can move actions – to varying degrees.  What happens if someone gets 99% of the way to ‘conversion’ and then backs out? Is that the same as 0% interest?  Of course not. Although, from the definition of ROI, in the
      strictest finance sense, we would say ‘yes’ – it is 0%. 

      That is the point we are trying to make.  In todays’ world with sophisticated metrics, there is value in knowing how close we were to marketing conversion. The study of web traffic is fundamental to this. The myriad of social conversation aggregation and analytics options take this to the next level.  In the earlier example I mentioned above, maybe the same person comes back and completes to conversion, adoption, whatever. Even after conversion, do they like the product, do they recommend to their
      associations and friends? 

      In trying to explain the frontier of online marketing and social channels and how that impacts our decision making process, the ‘Return on Influence’ reference connects the dots for our clients and prospective clients. 

      Again, thanks for reaching out to us.  We appreciate your intelligent and thoughtful discussion.